The BCCI has banned journalist Boria Majumdar for two years for “threatening and intimidating” India wicketkeeper Wriddhiman Saha. The ban, which includes not getting press accreditation for any matches in India, however on interviewing centrally contracted players and no access to any of the cricket board’s and state units’ facilities, has been made effective after the Apex Council rubber-stamped the three -member fact-finding committee’s recommendations.
The Indian Express exclusively reported on April 23 that the BCCI was set to ban Majumdar after its three-member committee comprising the cricket board’s vice-president Rajiv Shukla, treasurer Arun Dhumal and the BCCI Apex Council member Prabhtej Singh Bhatia found him guilty of “bullying Saha. As reported by this paper, a communication would be sent to the ICC also, that they ban the journalist for global events.
On Wednesday, the BCCI’s interim CEO Hemang Amin wrote to all the member units, The Indian Express has accessed the letter, informing them about the punishment meted out to the journalist and requesting for compliance.
“The BCCI Committee considered the submissions by both Mr Saha and Mr Majumdar and concluded that the actions by Mr Majumdar were indeed in the nature of threat and intimidation. The BCCI Committee recommended the following sanctions to the Apex Council of BCCI. The Apex Council of BCCI agreed with the recommendations of the BCCI Committee and imposed the following sanctions: i. 2 (two) year ban on getting any accreditation as a member of the press in any of the cricket matches (domestic and international) in India; ii. 2 (two) year ban on getting any interview with any registered players in India; and iii. 2 (two) year ban on access to any of BCCI and members associations owned cricket facilities.”
After all of my contributions to Indian cricket…this is what I face from a so called “Respected” journalist! This is where the journalism has gone. pic.twitter.com/woVyq1sOZX
— Wriddhiman Saha (@Wriddhipops) February 19, 2022
The probe journalist committee was constituted “to look into the matter of Wriddhiman Saha receiving threats and intimidation from a senior”. It came on the heels of the 37-year-old wicketkeeper posting a tweet on February 19 that captured a screenshot of the messages like: “After all of my contributions to Indian cricket..this is what I face from a so called “Respected ”journalist! This is where the journalism has gone.” Another message purportedly sent by the journalist had said: “You did not call. Never again will I interview you. I don’t take insults kindly. And I will remember this.”
This was after Saha was dropped from the Test team for the home series against Sri Lanka. A lot of former cricketers, including ex-Indian team head coach Ravi Shastri, sympathized with Saha, but the wicketkeeper refused to name the journalist in public. However, I have revealed the identity of the person, Boria Majumdar, at the hearing.
Majumdar had earlier told this paper that he would file a defamation suit against Saha. “I’m filing a defamation case on Wriddhiman Saha. He has doctored, tampered and manipulated screenshots. Earlier today, I have sent the BCCI all the details and I have emailed everybody in the BCCI the entire sequence of events. I have also tweeted my side of the story,” Majumdar had said.
In his statement to the BCCI, the journalist had claimed that Saha’s manager visited his residence on February 1 and set up “two interviews as a brand building exercise”. On February 10, ahead of the IPL mega auction, Majumdar had sent some texts to the player via WhatsApp. A series of texts was sent on February 13 also after Saha was roped in by Gujarat Titans on the second day of the IPL auction. The journalist’s statement gave details of his WhatsApp texts to Saha, claiming that the latter had “confirmed an interview over Zoom”. As per the statement, the context of the texts was “the disappointment over failure of Mr. Saha to comply with his professional commitment by him and hence was an expression of dismay by Mr. Majumdar”. The journalist had denied any threats or hostile action.