Read Amar Ujala e-paper
anywhere anytime.
*Yearly subscription for just ₹299 Limited Period Offer. HURRY UP!
Hear the news
Hear the news
Like many of its previous steps, the Agriculture Government had also claimed that the Central Government was historic and claimed that this will improve the condition of the farmers of the country, it will help in increasing their income. But the laws passed have increased the resentment of the farmers. Farmers have said that if these laws remain in existence, then this will make farmers slaves of companies. Read from which point of law, farmers are in trouble and now the government has agreed to bring changes in them-
The farmers have objected to this law that if APMC is procured outside the mandis, then the farmers will not get the minimum support price. Farmers will sell crops in the open market due to high price greed, this will make APMC mandis irrelevant and later the government will find an excuse to close them. After this, gradually the government will end the APMC and the minimum support price system.
Regarding this, the farmers give the example of Bihar where the APMC mandi system was abolished from the year 2006, but till date the condition of the farmers here has not improved. Farmers of Bihar still sell their crops in APMC mandis having MSP of Punjab-Haryana with the help of big traders. Small farmers are unable to do this either and their condition has deteriorated completely.
However, after the farmers’ protests, the government has made it clear that it is willing to give a written assurance that the APMC mandis will not be abolished and the minimum support price will continue. But now farmers are demanding to make the minimum support price a legal right.
The farmers are worried that this will grab the land of the corporate houses. After the agreement, the farmer will have no right over his own land and crop. Later, in the absence of work, the farmers will work on these lands. The farmers are worried that officials like SDM will listen to the company and the farmers will not be able to say their words. The case should be allowed to go to trial in civil court.
After the agitation, the government has now allowed the farmers to go to the civil court if there is any fraud in the agreement. The government says that no agreement will be made on the farmer’s land. Therefore, the apprehension of the farmers that their land may be grabbed. The government is also talking about the continuation of similar contract farming in many parts of the country, including Punjab.
But by removing the limit of procurement and storage, companies will buy more in the lure of profit, and for this they will make cold storage. This will buy more crops and benefit the farmers. While opponents of the law say that if a businessman makes a large amount of purchases, then later he will make huge money through black marketing. This will cause a huge jump in the prices of that commodity and will be out of the reach of common man.
The farmers argue that the government will give direct subsidy while they have to pay the electricity bill on time. This will increase the debt burden on them. There is a possibility that there may be a shortfall in subsidizing. In view of the huge opposition from the farmers, now the government has spoken of not bringing this law.
abstract
- The central government talked about resolving all the doubts of the farmers, but the deadlock still persisted, farmers have been standing on the borders of Delhi demanding complete withdrawal of the disputed laws.
Detailed
Like many of its previous steps, the Agriculture Government had also claimed that the Central Government was historic and claimed that this will improve the condition of the farmers of the country, it will help in increasing their income. But the laws passed have increased the resentment of the farmers. Farmers have said that if these laws remain in existence, then this will make farmers slaves of companies. Read from which point of law, farmers are in trouble and now the government has agreed to bring changes in them-
1. Agricultural Produce Trade and Commerce (Promotion and Simplification) Bill, 2020
The farmers have objected to this law that if APMC is procured outside the mandis, then the farmers will not get the minimum support price. Farmers will sell crops in the open market due to high price greed, this will make APMC mandis irrelevant and later the government will find an excuse to close them. After this, gradually the government will end the APMC and the minimum support price system.
Regarding this, the farmers give the example of Bihar where the APMC mandi system was abolished from the year 2006, but till date the condition of the farmers here has not improved. Farmers of Bihar still sell their crops in APMC mandis having MSP of Punjab-Haryana with the help of big traders. Small farmers are unable to do this either and their condition has deteriorated completely.
However, after the farmers’ protests, the government has made it clear that it is willing to give a written assurance that the APMC mandis will not be abolished and the minimum support price will continue. But now farmers are demanding to make the minimum support price a legal right.
2. Agricultural Empowerment and Protection Price Assurance and Agricultural Services Agreement Bill, 2020
The farmers are worried that this will grab the land of the corporate houses. After the agreement, the farmer will have no right over his own land and crop. Later, in the absence of work, the farmers will work on these lands. The farmers are worried that officials like SDM will listen to the company and the farmers will not be able to say their words. The case should be allowed to go to trial in civil court.
After the agitation, the government has now allowed the farmers to go to the civil court if there is any fraud in the agreement. The government says that no agreement will be made on the farmer’s land. Therefore, the apprehension of the farmers that their land may be grabbed. The government is also talking about the continuation of similar contract farming in many parts of the country, including Punjab.
3. The Essential Commodities Amendment Bill, 2020
But by removing the limit of procurement and storage, companies will buy more in the lure of profit, and for this they will make cold storage. This will buy more crops and benefit the farmers. While opponents of the law say that if a businessman makes a large amount of purchases, then later he will make huge money through black marketing. This will cause a huge jump in the prices of that commodity and will be out of the reach of common man.
Opposition to electricity proposal too
The farmers argue that the government will give direct subsidy while they have to pay the electricity bill on time. This will increase the debt burden on them. There is a possibility that there may be a shortfall in subsidizing. In view of the huge opposition from the farmers, now the government has spoken of not bringing this law.
read ahead
1. Agricultural Produce Trade and Commerce (Promotion and Simplification) Bill, 2020
www.amarujala.com