- Police said, riots in north-east Delhi were also alleged conspiracies
- Further said – ‘Dhritarashtra’ is yet to be identified
- Ramayana, Maharashtra were also mentioned several times in court
- Accused plea – don’t wait 14 years to come out somewhere
In a case related to the Delhi riots, the context of Ramayana and Mahabharata arose in the court on Thursday. When the Mahabharata was mentioned by the police, the accused tried to keep his plea firmly by taking the name of Ramayana. In fact, the Delhi Police said in a court here on Thursday that just as there was a story of Sanskrit epic ‘Mahabharata’ conspiracy, similarly the riots in north-east Delhi were also alleged conspiracies, whose ‘Dhritarashtra’ is yet to be identified. remains.
After this, the accused, who requested bail from the court, made his argument like the police argument. He said that this case could not be like Ramayana where we have to wait 14 years to finally come out.
Read, BJP’s sit-in outside Kejriwal’s house, court said – this is the beginning of wrong tradition
Debate on Natasha Narwal’s bail plea
Both the prosecution and the defense compared their times to the characters of mythological texts – Ramayana and Mahabharata – to present their arguments. These arguments were made during the debate on the bail plea of Natasha Narwal, a student of JNU and a member of the ‘cage break’ campaign.
Narwal was arrested under the Unlawful Activities Prevention Act (UAPA) for allegedly participating in a premeditated conspiracy of riots. His lawyer said that the prosecution has created a ‘Chakravyuh’ against Narwal and the accused will try to come out of it like Abhimanyu of Mahabharata.
Read: If the onion is not given for salad, the daily laborer stabbed the knife, arrested
It was argued on behalf of the accused that the charge sheet filed against him is the second largest document after Mahabharata. On this, Special Public Prosecutor Amit Prasad, appearing on behalf of the police, said that the WhatsApp group called ‘Delhi Protest Support Group’ (DPSG) is like Sanjay’s character, who narrates everything to Dhritarashtra.
Delhi riot: Why did the police say… so this is the end of the rule of law
Prasad told Additional Sessions Judge Amitabh Rawat that the DPSG allegedly supervised and commanded all the protest venues and aimed not to stage a protest but to do a ‘chakka jam’ and that it would result in violence. was. The prosecutor said, “The counsel for the accused said that the charge sheet is the largest document after the Mahabharata. He said that the Mahabharata was 22,000 pages and the charge sheet is 17,000 pages. I want to say that Mahabharata was the story of a conspiracy and incidentally this case is also a conspiracy. There was Sanjay in the Mahabharata, who (sitting far away) could see everything. ‘
He said, ‘Sanjay is the DPSG of this conspiracy. Sanjay was narrating everything to Dhritarashtra. Dhritarashtra has not been identified here yet. Advocate Adit Pujari, appearing for Narwal, said, “A chakravyuh has been created by the prosecution in the last eight hearings. Our effort will be like Abhimanyu, so that we can distinguish it. It is clear that this is being done because the charge sheet does not make any prima facie case. ‘
The priest said, ‘This case is not going to be Ramayana where we have to wait 14 years to get out of it. Whatever will happen here and now. During the hearing through video conference, the computers of both the prosecution and defense lawyers were interrupted, which were restarted and further arguments were made.
Kejriwal speaks from the center tearing copies of agricultural laws – advocate farmers, not brokers